MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409374967 · doi:10.3168/jdsc.2024-0725

Association between postpartum systemic inflammation and serum calcium in healthy multiparous dairy cows—An exploratory observational analysis

2025· article· en· W4409374967 on OpenAlexaff
Rita Couto Serrenho, R.C. Neves, S.J. LeBlanc

Bibliographic record

VenueJDS Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyCalciumSystemic inflammationInflammationMedicineObstetricsPhysiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

× parity, and farm as a random effect. A stepwise backward elimination approach was applied to improve model parsimony. The lowest albumin and greatest haptoglobin and SAA concentrations were observed at d 2. The association of albumin with tCa varied quadratically over time. At d 0, 0.5, 1, and 2, as tCa decreased, albumin increased, but at d 4, 6, and 8 as tCa decreased, albumin also decreased. At d 0, 0.5, and 1, when tCa <1.7 mmol/L, tCa and haptoglobin were positively associated. Total calcium <1.7 mmol/L was not observed ≥d 2. After d 1, cows with lower tCa tended to have greater haptoglobin concentrations. The greatest concentration of SAA occurred when tCa was 1.9 mmol/L. Values of tCa <1.9 mmol/L were mainly observed at d 0. At d 0, and when tCa was <1.9 mmol/L, lower tCa was associated with lesser SAA concentration. However, when tCa was >1.9 mmol/L (93% and 99% of the values observed at d 2 and 4, respectively), lower tCa was associated with greater SAA concentration. The associations between tCa and markers of SI changed in the first 8 d of lactation in clinically healthy cows. Potential interventions to modulate hypocalcemia or SI, or both, should consider their interactions. Future studies should further explore the association of the degree and duration of hypocalcemia and SI to better understand the direction and mechanisms of this relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJDS CommunicationsSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207