Entanglement, soft modes, and celestial CFT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bstract We revisit the calculation of vacuum entanglement entropy in free Maxwell theory in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime. Weyl invariance allows for this theory to be embedded as a patch inside the Einstein static universe. We use conformal inversions to extend the conformal primary solutions of the equations of motion labelled by a boost-weight ∆ = 1 + iλ to an inverted Minkowski patch centered at spacelike infinity of the original patch. For λ ≠ 0 these solutions admit an expansion in terms of wavefunctions supported in the (future) Milne wedges of the original and inverted Minkowski patches, that diagonalize the respective Milne times. The Minkowski vacuum can then be described as a thermofield double state on these two Milne wedges. We characterize the soft sectors of λ = 0 modes supported in the two Milne wedges. Upon reinterpreting the non-pure gauge λ = 0 wavefunctions as sourced by image charges in the inverse Minkowski patch, we construct an appropriate entangling constraint in the Minkowski theory, thereby characterizing the physical state space. We show that the edge mode contribution to the vacuum entanglement entropy is due to correlations between the soft charges of the two Milne patches, or equivalently non-trivial conformally soft mode configurations at the entangling surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".