Understanding the Perception of Adolescent Challenges in Body Mass Index Reduction: A Qualitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A weight loss program for adolescents needs to be done immediately, considering that the number of adolescents who are obese is increasing. This research contributes to identifying the challenges faced by overweight adolescents in weight loss programs. Data was collected by filling out a questionnaire given directly to the participants. The location where the research was conducted at Yogyakarta City, Indonesia. The questionnaire has been tested for validity and reliability with a value of more than 0.85. This study uses a qualitative research design, with a sample of adolescents aged 15-19 years who are obese. The number of participants is 15; according to the inclusion criteria, the data is taken through in-depth interviews. Results: The difficulty of overweight adolescents in losing weight is due to the lack of parental support in serving food and the lack of support from friends in diet programs. Health programs for adolescents, especially weight loss programs, need to involve peers and support from parents
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".