Pengembangan Kepribadian Pemuda pada Era Society 5.0 untuk Menguatkan Konsep Diri
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapid technological developments in the Society 5.0 era have had a significant impact on the character and personality of the younger generation. Ease of access to information and interaction in cyberspace has the potential to cause the younger generation to lose their identity and fall into negative behavior. Strengthening self-concept is crucial in facing this challenge. This research aims to strengthen students' self-concept as an effort to develop personality and build positive character in the Society 5.0 era. This research involved 50 students from various organizations at Muhammadiyah University Kendal Batang. The method used is a socialization workshop with a self-project approach, where students are asked to make a wish list and determine their priority scale. Evaluation is carried out through surveys to measure understanding of self-concept before and after the activity. The survey results showed an increase in students' understanding of self-concept after participating in the activity. Students become better able to recognize themselves, determine goals, and develop plans to achieve their goals. Apart from that, this activity also increases students' self-confidence and motivation. Strengthening self-concept through socialization workshop activities has proven effective in developing student personalities in the Society 5.0 era. Strengthening self-concept helps students build positive character, increase self-confidence, and develop the ability to determine life goals and develop plans to achieve them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".