MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409412433 · doi:10.1186/s12987-025-00646-9

Erythrocyte-derived extracellular vesicles transcytose across the blood-brain barrier to induce Parkinson’s disease-like neurodegeneration

2025· article· en· W4409412433 on OpenAlexafffund
Hélèna L. Denis, Aurélie de Rus Jacquet, Melanie Alpaugh, Michel Panisset, Roger A. Barker, Éric Boilard, Francesca Cicchetti

Bibliographic record

VenueFluids and Barriers of the CNS · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-QuébecCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité LavalUniversity of GuelphCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreWeston Brain InstituteHuntington's Disease Society of AmericaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchParkinson's FoundationFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsNeurodegenerationExtracellular vesiclesParkinson's diseaseBlood–brain barrierNeurologyMedicineDiseaseNeuroscienceHematologyMicrovesiclesExtracellularPathologyChemistryBiologyImmunologyInternal medicineCentral nervous systemBiochemistryCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative illness characterized by motor and non-motor features. Hallmarks of the disease include an extensive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, evidence of neuroinflammation, and the accumulation of misfolded proteins leading to the formation of Lewy bodies. While PD etiology is complex and identifying a single disease trigger has been a challenge, accumulating evidence indicates that non-neuronal and peripheral factors may likely contribute to disease onset and progression. The brain is shielded from peripheral factors by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which tightly controls the entry of systemic molecules and cells from the blood to the brain. The BBB integrates molecular signals originating from the luminal (blood) and abluminal (brain) sides of the endothelial wall, regulating these exchanges. Of particular interest are erythrocytes, which are not only the most abundant cell type in the blood, but they also secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs) that display disease-specific signatures over the course of PD. Erythrocyte-derived EVs (EEVs) could provide a route by which pathological molecular signals travel from the periphery to the central nervous system. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate, in a human-based platform, mechanisms of EEV transport from the blood to the brain under physiological conditions. The secondary objective was to determine the ability of EEVs, generated by erythrocytes of healthy donors or patients, to induce PD-like features. We leveraged two in vitro models of the BBB, the transwell chambers and a microfluidic BBB chip generated using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Our findings suggest that EEVs transcytose from the vascular to the brain compartment of the human BBB model via a caveolin-dependant mechanism. Furthermore, EEVs derived from individuals with PD altered BBB integrity compared to healthy EEV controls, and clinical severity aggravated the loss of barrier integrity and increased EEV extravasation into the brain compartment. PD-derived EEVs reduced ZO-1 and Claudin 5 tight junction levels in BMEC-like cells and induced the selective atrophy of dopaminergic neurons. In contrast, non-dopaminergic neurons were not affected by treatment with PD EEVs. In summary, our data suggest that EEV interactions at the human BBB can be studied using a highly translational human-based brain chip model, and EEV toxicity at the neurovascular unit is exacerbated by disease severity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFluids and Barriers of the CNSSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207