Repurposing of the RIPK1-Selective Benzo[1,4]oxazepin-4-one Scaffold for the Development of a Type III LIMK1/2 Inhibitor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Benzoxazepinones have been extensively studied as exclusively selective RIP kinase 1 inhibitors. This scaffold binds to an allosteric pocket created by an αC-out/DFG-out conformation. This inactive conformation results in a large expansion of the kinase back pocket, a conformation that has also been reported for LIM kinases. Scaffold hopping is common in the design of orthosteric kinase inhibitors but has not been explored in the design of allosteric inhibitors, mainly due to the typically exclusive selectivity of type III inhibitors. Here, we hypothesized that the shared structural properties of LIMKs and RIPKs could lead to novel type III LIMK inhibitors using the benzoxazepinone scaffold. We report the discovery of a novel LIMK1/2 inhibitor that relies on this scaffold-based approach. The discovered compound 10 showed low nanomolar potency on LIMK1/2 and exceptional selectivity, as confirmed by a comprehensive selectivity panel with residual RIPK activity as the only off-target. The study provides one of the few examples for scaffold hopping for allosteric inhibitors, which are usually associated with exclusive target selectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".