The prevalence of pathogenic variants in the BMPR2 gene in patients with the idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension in the Russian population: sequencing data and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is a rare and severe form of pulmonary hypertension, with a genetic basis most commonly associated with mutations in the BMPR2 gene. However, no genetic testing has been reported for IPAH patients in the Russian population, nor have systematic studies been conducted to assess the frequency of pathogenic variants in this group. METHODS: The study cohort included 105 IPAH patients, consisting of 23 males and 82 females, who were managed at the PH care center in Moscow, Russia, from 2014 to 2024. Genetic testing was performed using whole-genome sequencing. Variant identification and annotation were conducted using GATK, DeepVariant, VEP, sv-callers and AnnotSV. A meta-analysis, performed with MOOSE, included 24 studies involving 3124 IPAH patients and 470 P/LP variants. Pathogenicity reassessment was carried out using InterVar, which incorporates ACMG criteria. RESULTS: Analysis of 105 adult IPAH patients in Russia revealed 11 patients (10.48%) as carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenetic (P/LP) BMPR2 variants. As the result of reassessment, the number of P/LP BMPR2 variants raised from 394 (59%) to 445 (67%) with 80 pathogenic variants became of uncertain significance, and 152 unclassified variants became P/LP. The meta-analysis of these reevaluated pathogenic variants showed that while the frequency of P/LP variants in our cohort (10.48%) is lower than the overall average of 17.75% from the meta-analysis, the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.062). Additionally, we report three P/LP BMPR2 variants, not reported in literature, with one being structural, and four P/LP variants in TBX4, ATP13A3 and AQP1 genes from 27 IPAH genes in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we present the results of genetic testing in IPAH patients from the Russian population. Despite the considerable heterogeneity in the world-wide data, the prevalence of pathogenic BMPR2 mutations in IPAH patients from the Russian population does not significantly differ from the overall average in the meta-analysis. It is crucial to periodically reassess the pathogenicity of published variants, as half of the pathogenic BMPR2 IPAH variants were reclassified as LP or of uncertain significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".