MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409434058 · doi:10.3390/app15084248

Non-Thermal Plasma-Catalytic Conversion of Biogas to Value-Added Liquid Chemicals via Ni-Fe/Al2O3 Catalyst

2025· article· en· W4409434058 on OpenAlexafffund
Milad Zehtab Salmasi, Razieh Es’haghian, Ali Omidkar, Hua Song

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsCatalysisBiogasChemical engineeringMaterials scienceWaste managementValue (mathematics)Pulp and paper industryChemistryOrganic chemistryEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the transformation of biogas (methane and carbon dioxide) into high-value liquid products using Ni/Al2O3, Fe/Al2O3, and Ni-Fe/Al2O3 catalysts in a non-thermal plasma (NTP)-assisted process within a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor, operating at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. We compared the effectiveness of these three catalysts, with the Ni-Fe/Al2O3 catalyst showing the highest enhancement in conversion rates, achieving 34.8% for CH4 and 19.7% for CO2. This catalyst also promoted the highest liquid yield observed at 38.6% and facilitated a significant reduction in coke formation to 10.4%, minimizing deactivation and loss of efficiency. These improvements underscore the catalyst’s pivotal role in enhancing the overall process efficiency, leading to the production of key gas products such as hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO), alongside valuable liquid oxygenates including methanol, ethanol, formaldehyde, acetic acid, and propanoic acid. The findings from this study highlight the efficacy of combining NTP with the Ni-Fe/Al2O3 catalyst as a promising approach for boosting the production of valuable chemicals from biogas, offering a sustainable pathway for energy and chemical manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207