Microarray analysis of the effects of Acthar Gel versus methylprednisolone in a model of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in female rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) is an alternative treatment for patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) who cannot tolerate or do not adequately respond to glucocorticoids or calcineurin inhibitors. We compared the effects of Acthar versus methylprednisolone (MP) on gene expression in the kidney cortex in a rat model of FSGS induced by puromycin. Female Sprague-Dawley rats (6-8 weeks old) were treated for 8 weeks with Acthar 60 IU/kg (n = 5), MP 2 mg/kg (n = 5), or control (n = 4). On Day 56, animals were sacrificed, and RNA samples of kidney cortex tissue were analyzed using microarrays. Compared with control, Acthar significantly decreased the expression of more genes related to inflammation, immune function, and fibrosis than MP. A subset of these genes exhibited significantly larger fold changes in expression after treatment with Acthar versus MP, including C1qb and C1qc (complement cascade), Ccr2 and Tcrb (immune function), and Mfap4 and Vim (fibrosis). These results suggest that Acthar acts as an immunomodulator with a distinct mechanism of action from that of MP. Their differential alteration of gene expression in the kidney cortex suggests that Acthar may be more effective than MP in reducing inflammation and fibrosis in FSGS, which could slow disease progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".