A review of public perception and awareness of e-waste management in developing countries: challenges and opportunities for sustainable solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
E-waste, or electronic waste, has become a growing concern in developing countries due to the rapid increase in electronic device usage and the lack of proper waste management systems. This review examines the public perception and awareness of e-waste management in developing nations, highlighting key challenges, and exploring opportunities for sustainable solutions. Findings reveal that a significant portion of the population in these regions remains unaware of the health and environmental risks associated with improper e-waste disposal. Socioeconomic and cultural factors, combined with limited access to formal recycling infrastructure, contribute to the reliance on informal, and hazardous recycling methods. Additionally, weak regulatory frameworks further hinder the implementation of effective e-waste management practices. Despite these challenges, there are opportunities to improve public perception and behavior through targeted education campaigns, stronger government policies, and greater involvement from the private sector. Shifting public attitudes towards viewing e-waste as a valuable resource, rather than simply as waste, is crucial for fostering more sustainable practices. This review underscores the need for collaborative efforts between governments, industry, and the public to address the e-waste crisis and to establish systems that ensure both environmental protection and public health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".