MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409468646 · doi:10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100164

Predictive value of self-prioritized mobility factors on gait speed and life space in older nigerians: A cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4409468646 on OpenAlexafffund
Divine Esohe Eghomwanre, Freeman Ojeikere Ahonsi, Daniel Rayner, Francis O. Kolawole, Henrietta O. Fawole, Michael Kalu

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityYork UniversityMcMaster University
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsNigeriansCross-sectional studyValue (mathematics)Predictive valuePreferred walking speedMedicinePsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationStatisticsMathematicsPolitical scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Nigerian older adults say doctors should check their age, muscle power, strength, endurance and pain when discharging them. • Environmental, social, psychological, financial, physical, and personal factors predicted life space, but cognitive factors did not. • Environmental, social, psychological, cognitive, physical, and personal factors predicted gait speed, but financial factors did not. • Self-prioritized mobility factors explained 74 % of the variance in gait speed, stronger than the 50 % for life space. Eighty-two cognitive, environmental, financial, personal, physical, psychological, and social factors significantly influence mobility decline following hospital discharge. However, assessing all these factors during the fast-paced discharge process is impractical. This study aimed to identify the factors that Nigerian older adults consider most critical and determine which factors (in combination) most realistically predict gait speed and life space among these Nigerian older adults. This is data from a cross-sectional survey that recruited 400 Nigerian older adults, 60+ years old, to rank 82 factors influencing mobility. Older adults' gait speed and life-space mobility were collected using the 10-meter Walk Test and Life Space Assessment. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to determine the most realistic predictor of gait speed and life-space mobility. No factors were considered critical by the older adults. The life space model indicates that increased street characteristics, social cohesion, occupation, hearing, gait speed, fear of falling, and conscientiousness accounts for approximately 50% of variations in life space. The gait speed model indicates that an increase in executive function, pain, respiratory system, body composition, fatigue, social factors, racial characteristics, marital status, social network, and fear of reinjury explain about 74 % of variation in gait speed. This study provides self-reported factors that could influence older adults' mobility following discharge that would allow clinicians to prioritize factors for assessment amidst multiple factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics PlusSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207