MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409468951 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.04.020

The association between serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, placental growth factor, and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio in singleton pregnancy and placental abruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4409468951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katarzyna Kosińska–Kaczyńska, Iwona Szymusik, Robert Brawura-Biskupski-Samaha, Dorota Sys

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlacental abruptionObstetricsMeta-analysisSingletonPregnancyAssociation (psychology)Internal medicineFetusGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate whether women with singleton pregnancies who experienced subsequent placental abruption had lower serum placental growth factor concentrations, higher serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 concentrations, and a higher soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio compared to women with singleton pregnancies without placental abruption. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases had been searched electronically until March 2025, using combinations of relevant medical subject heading terms, keywords, and word variants considered suitable for the topic. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies and case-control studies were included. Case reports, editorials, letters to the editor, and conference abstracts were excluded from the systematic review. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The outcome of the study included differences in placental growth factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 concentrations, or the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio between placental abruption cases and a group without placental abruption. The quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Continuous data were expressed as the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval when the units of measurement for the outcome variable were the same. When conducting the meta-analysis, a random effects model was consistently employed. RESULTS: The main findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis are as follows: 1) maternal serum placental growth factor concentration did not differ between women with and without placental abruption; 2) maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 concentration was higher in women with placental abruption, especially when assessed in the second half of gestation; and 3) maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio was higher in women with placental abruption, both in the first and second half of pregnancy, with the difference being no longer significant in women with the diagnosis or symptoms of preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: The results presented in this systematic review may improve the risk stratification for placental abruption. Understanding the changes of the above markers in placental abruption may support clinical guideline development with regard to prediction models of the above complication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.031
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207