MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409469013 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1547526

Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic investigation and abiotic stress responses analysis of the PP2C gene family in litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)

2025· article· en· W4409469013 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Yang, Rong Chen, Wei Liu, Chao Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneGene familyAbiotic stressAbscisic acidArabidopsisGeneticsArabidopsis thalianaSuperoxide dismutaseSegmental duplicationGene expressionBotanyBiochemistryEnzymeMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an important regulatory protein phosphatase in the abscisic acid (ABA) signal transduction pathway and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) cascade, type-2C protein phosphatase (PP2C) plays crucial roles in plant responses to abiotic stresses. However, the PP2C gene family’s responses to abiotic stress in litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) have not been systematically studied. In this study, we predicted the 68 PP2C (designated LcPP2C) genes randomly distributed across fourteen chromosomes in the litchi genome. Phylogenetic tree analysis among litchi, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and rice (Oryza sativa) revealed that the phylogenetic tree was divided into thirteen groups (A, B, C, D, E, F1, F2, G, H, I, J, K, and L). Closely linked LcPP2C genes within the same group exhibited various similarities in gene structures and motif compositions. Collinearity analysis demonstrated that segmental duplication (SD) events were the main dramatically increasing numbers in the LcPP2C gene family members. Cis-acting element analysis revealed that the 68 LcPP2C genes contained hormone and stress response elements with varying quantities, implying their potential in litchi stress resistance. Expression analysis showed that all the LcPP2C genes exhibited varying expression levels across nine different litchi tissues, more than 50% of genes within each group displayed similar tissue-specific expression patterns. The expression intensity, duration and regulation direction (up- or down-regulation) of the LcPP2C genes were varied under different abiotic stresses (cold, heat, and drought). The physiological and biochemical tests indicated that eight activation indexes (peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), proline (PRO), soluble protein (SP), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and soluble sugar (SS)) increase at different level. Additionally, we analyzed physicochemical properties, subcellular locations, and secondary structures of the LcPP2C family members. Notably, the extensive connectivity of LcPP2C32/60/9/37 underscored their vital roles in orchestrating and regulating biomolecular networks. These results provide valuable information for the identification of the LcPP2C genes and ideas for the cultivation of its transgenic induction lines in litchi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceFrench-language works237,207