MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409480994 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-97554-7

Oxygen saturation and acute mountain sickness during repeated altitude exposures simulating high-altitude working schedules

2025· article· en· W4409480994 on OpenAlexaff
Nina F Waldner, Sara E. Hartmann, Lara Muralt, Mona Lichtblau, Patrick R. Bader, Jean M. Rawling, Iván López, Silvia Ulrich, Marc J. Poulin, Konrad E. Bloch, Michaël Furian

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsAltitude (triangle)Effects of high altitude on humansAltitude sicknessHypoxia (environmental)Oxygen saturationOxygenAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeographyChemistryGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to quantify the effect of two consecutive prolonged, intermittent exposures to high and very high altitudes on oxygen saturation (SpO2) and acute mountain sickness (AMS). For this, healthy lowlanders (N = 21), aged 18–30 years, underwent two 7-day sojourns at the ALMA observatory, Chile (6 h/day at 5050 m, 18 h/day at 2900 m), separated by 1-week at 520 m. SpO2 (pulse oximetry) and AMS severity (AMSc, Environmental Symptom Questionnaire cerebral score) diagnosing AMS (AMSc ≥ 0.7) were assessed daily at both altitudes. The study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02730143. SpO2 at 2900 m and 5050 m on arrival was mean ± SD 93.6 ± 0.5% and 79.9 ± 1.0% (P < 0.05 between altitudes), whereas the AMSc scores were 0.43 ± 0.08 and 0.97 ± 0.11 (P < 0.05 between altitudes), respectively. At 2900 m during a 7-day intermittent hypoxic exposure, SpO2 increased by a mean (95% CI) 0.3 %/day (0.1;0.4) and by 0.9 %/day (0.4;1.3) at 5050 m. Similarly, AMSc decreased by 0.05 points/day (0.01;0.08) at 2900 m and by 0.16 points/day (0.11;0.21) at 5050 m. During the second sojourn (vs. 1st sojourn), day 1, SpO2 at 2900 m was unchanged but higher at 5050 m by 2.9% (0.6;5.3). AMSc was lower at 2900 m and 5050 m by 0.37 (0.16;0.59) and 0.37 (0.11;0.63) (P < 0.05 both comparisons vs 1st sojourn), respectively. Acclimatization with the 2nd sojourn increased SpO2 at 2900 m by 0.3%/day (0.1;0.4) and 5050 m by 0.5%/day (0.1;0.8). AMSc remained unchanged with acclimatization at 2900 m but decreased at 5050 m by 0.08 points/day (0.04;0.11). In conclusion, in healthy lowlanders, a 7-day intermittent hypobaric hypoxic exposure improved SpO2 and AMS severity at 2900 m, with larger improvements at 5050 m. During a second identical sojourn, initial AMS severity was reduced despite comparable SpO2 at 2900 m compared to the 1st sojourn. No further acclimatization effects were observed in SpO2 but in AMS symptoms at 2900 m. In contrast, re-exposure to 5050 m showed higher initial SpO2 and lower AMSc values with further improvement with intermittent re-exposures. These findings highlight altitude-dependent acclimatization patterns and confirm pre-conditioning’s effectiveness in preventing AMS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207