MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409483651 · doi:10.36778/jesya.v8i1.1996

Strategi Kolaborasi dalam Pengembangan dan Keberlanjutan Pasar Tematik Wisata Jelajah Danau Ranau Lumbok Seminung Kabupaten Lampung Barat

2025· article· en· W4409483651 on OpenAlexaff
Nurliana Nurliana

Bibliographic record

VenueJesya (Jurnal Ekonomi & Ekonomi Syariah) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The West Lampung Regency Government has allocated IDR 70 billion for the development of the Lake Ranau Lumbok Seminung Thematic Tourism Market as part of its tourism-based economic development strategy. This market is designed around the concepts of tourism, culture, and shopping to attract visitors and enhance the welfare of local communities. However, the primary challenge lies in ensuring the market's sustainability and effective utilization so that it does not experience the same fate as previous tourism facilities in the area, which suffered from suboptimal usage and sustainability. This policy paper employs a qualitative descriptive approach, utilizing Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), field studies, and policy analysis. The study’s findings indicate that the development and sustainability of the market require robust regulations, cross-sector collaboration, and community empowerment. Therefore, it is recommended that a Regent Regulation be enacted to systematically manage thematic markets, integrate a tourism curriculum into local education, and prioritize the designation of market locations in community and MSME empowerment programs. The implementation of this policy is expected to support inclusive economic growth, enhance the attractiveness of regional tourism, and ensure the sustainability of thematic tourism markets as strategic assets for West Lampung Regency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJesya (Jurnal Ekonomi & Ekonomi Syariah)Same topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207