MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409485422 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-96361-4

Detection of the GH analogue somatrogon in doping control urine samples by means of LC-HRMS/MS

2025· article· en· W4409485422 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Katja Walpurgis, Andreas Thomas, Alexandra Rauer, Bettina Majer, Mitsuhiko Sato, Masato Okano, Maneera Al-Jaber, Wadha Abushareeda, Cristian Arsene, Hans Geyer, Mario Thevis

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorld Anti-Doping Agency
KeywordsUrineChromatographyChemistryIn vivoGrowth hormoneExtraction (chemistry)Ultrafiltration (renal)BiologyBiochemistryHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Somatrogon is a synthetic growth hormone (GH) analog, whose misuse in sports is prohibited at all times. As analytical approaches complementary to existing immunological GH detection methods were considered beneficial for its detection in doping control serum samples, a sensitive and specific qualitative mass spectrometric assay was recently developed, comprehensively characterized, and successfully employed to analyze authentic in vivo study samples. Within this follow-up project, this approach based on affinity purification, tryptic digestion, and LC-HRMS/MS was modified by implementing an additional ultrafiltration step to allow for the extraction of the intact drug and/or its metabolites from urine. Method validation demonstrated its specificity and sensitivity (LOD: 1 ng/mL), and the subsequent analysis of post-administration urine samples showed for the first time that intact (or at least GH receptor binding) somatrogon is excreted into urine and can be detected in most subjects for at least 96 h following injection. Consequently, anti-doping laboratories can also use urine to confirm the presence of somatrogon in athletes, where the GH differential isoform assay yielded atypical results in the corresponding serum specimens. Moreover, the latter assay also proved to be valuable as screening tool for the identification of urine samples potentially containing the GH analog.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207