MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409492807 · doi:10.1080/00207179.2025.2481602

Improved-third-order-extended-state-observer-based sliding-mode control using singular perturbation theory for flexible-joint robot

2025· article· en· W4409492807 on OpenAlexaff
Yuhui Hu, Xiaohui Yang, Yang Li, Chao Huang, Xiaoping Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Sliding mode controlSingular perturbationState observerRobotObserver (physics)Perturbation (astronomy)Mode (computer interface)MathematicsThird orderControl engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Mathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligenceNonlinear systemLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to cope with the changing industrial operation environment, based on the Flexible Joint Robot systems (FJR), this paper explores a control method of decoupling high-order systems by using singular perturbation theory (SPT). Considering the limitations of SPT in FJR systems, the method of introducing a saturated flexible compensator is used to change the premise that the joints need to be assumed to be weakly flexible, thereby expanding the application scope of SPT in such systems. Moreover, the improved third-order time-varying parameters extended state observer is used to observe the lumped interferences which can effectively suppress the peak problem caused by the initial value, and the adaptive continuous nonsingular fast terminal sliding film control method is combined to control the slow subsystem. Aiming at the fast subsystem, the integral flow is used to reconstruct and fast terminal sliding mode control method is combined to improve the initial oscillation problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ControlSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207