MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409494142 · doi:10.1109/ojpel.2025.3561627

Hybrid Resonant and Non-Resonant Coupled-Inductor-Based Current-Fed DC–DC Converter

2025· article· en· W4409494142 on OpenAlexaff
Armin Miremad, Suzan Eren

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductorResonant converterCurrent (fluid)Resonant inverterElectrical engineeringPhysicsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceConvertersVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a hybrid resonant and non-resonant coupled-inductor-based current-fed DC-DC converter, designed for solar-tile microinverter (MI) applications requiring high voltage gain. In the proposed circuit, a boost half-bridge (BHB) is connected to the PV side, providing higher voltage for the half-bridge stage and reducing the primary conduction losses. Additionally, an active voltage-doubler rectifier is utilized on the secondary-side to achieve a two-fold voltage gain, thereby reducing the required transformer turns ratio and size. The proposed circuit is derived by integrating the input dc inductor of the BHB into a coupled-inductor, introducing an additional resonant path that enhances power transfer capacity without requiring extra active switches. The introduction of the resonant path contributes to narrow the switching-frequency range, reduce the turn-off current and switching losses, and improve the efficiency while increasing the power transfer capability compared to the non-resonant configurations. The design procedure is presented to minimize current stress, extend ZVS range, and reduce reverse input current. The ZVS regions for primary and secondary switches are determined under different load conditions and voltage gains. Two control parameters, phase-shift and switching frequency, emerges due to the active rectifier and the resonant coupled-inductor, providing more flexibility in regulating output power, minimizing back-flow power, and maintaining ZVS across all switches. Experimental results provided from a 100 W prototype, to validate the performance of the proposed converter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207