MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409497395 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0320639

Isolation of a potentially arsenic-resistant Halomonas elongata strain (ml10562) from hypersaline systems in the Peruvian Andes, Cusco

2025· article· en· W4409497395 on OpenAlexaff
Shirly Pila-Lacuta, David Pauccar, Jorge Rojas-Vargas, Ulises E. Rodríguez-Cruz, José Luis Sierra-Monzón, Hugo G. Castelán‐Sánchez, María Antonieta Quispe-Ricalde

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHalomonasArsenicBiologyStrain (injury)MicrobiologyGenomeBioremediationHalophileGeneticsBacteriaGeneChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Halomonas elongata strain ml10562, was isolated from hypersaline that was collected from Acos Peru. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and dDDH (digital DNA-DNA Hybridization) values between strain ml10562 and type strains of Halomonas elongata species were 71.0-78.4% and 18.8-21.5%, respectively. The draft genome, spanning 4,075,440 base pairs, has a GC content of 64.2% and contains 3,912 genes. Functional characterization revealed the strain's ability to tolerate and resist increasing concentrations of sodium arsenate, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 25 mM. Bioinformatic analysis revealed the presence of two operons, arsR-arsH-arsB and arsJ-gapdh-arsC, in the genome of strain ml10562, which could play a crucial role in arsenic resistance through transporter-mediated mechanisms. Overall, these results emphasize the potential adaptability of H. elongata ml10562 to arsenic-containing environments and extend our understanding of bacterial arsenic resistance mechanisms, allowing promising applications in bioremediation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207