MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409497694 · doi:10.5006/c2025-00017

Recent Experience from Field Application and Laboratory Testing on the Corrosion Risk of Stainless Steel UNS S82551 in Water Alternating Gas Service

2025· article· en· W4409497694 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Leballeur, Nicolas Larché, Sten B. Axelsen, Lucrezia Scoppio, Kyohei Kanki, Julien Pellé, Mona Haukali, Hisashi Amaya, Perry Ian Nice

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsIntertek (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionService (business)Field (mathematics)MetallurgyMaterials scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Duplex stainless steel UNS1 S82551 tubing has been used since 2017 in Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection wells on the Norwegian continental shelf. After approximately five years of operation, leaks were reported in two wells. Investigations were performed to determine the root cause of these failures, including a review of the metallurgy and fluids used during well construction and operation phases. The metallurgy included, amongst others, the following alloys: UNS S82551, UNS S39274 and UNS N09925. Inspection of the retrieved well components revealed that the leaks were caused by crevice corrosion to the tubing threaded connections. UNS S82551 is expected to be corrosion resistant in WAG service utilizing treated seawater and dried gas. However, earlier extensive laboratory testing showed that this alloy can be sensitive to crevice corrosion under seawater treatment deviations. Subsequent laboratory corrosion testing including all fluids in contact with the well materials during construction showed no impact on crevice corrosion. The root cause analysis revealed that the operating treatment procedure allowed residual chlorine in the injected seawater. Immersion and electrochemical testing confirmed that the conditions of exposure induced by the operation procedure led to crevice corrosion of alloy UNS S82551, and this was the root cause of the tubing leaks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metalsFrench-language works237,207