MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409502343 · doi:10.5006/c2022-18022

Implication of Fractographic Analysis of the Crack in an above Ground Pipeline - Potential Role of Hydrogen

2022· article· en· W4409502343 on OpenAlexaff
Noelle Easter C. Co, Satya Kompally, Ming Gao, Thomas Coates, Ravi Krishnamurthy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Failure Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCanadian Natural Resources
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)HydrogenGeologyMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A crack was found in 2020 on a 324 mm (12-inch) OD above ground pipeline externally uncoated but insulated with mineral wool with aluminum cladding. The steel grade of the pipeline is CSA Z245.1 Gr 414 Category II with wall thickness of 7.9 mm (0.310-inch) operating since 2013. The product that the pipeline transports is casing gas and the pipeline is operated at a temperature of 150-200 °C. The circumferential crack initiated on the outer diameter (OD) and grew through-wall. Detailed fractographic analysis showed a mixed mode of fracture: predominantly intergranular separation with a small amount of cleavage corresponding to {001} lattice plane, which is confirmed by mated fracture surfaces and the presence of {001} etching pits. Striation-like features were found on the fracture surface; however, these striation-like features are not due to fatigue. Metallographic cross section analysis also showed the crack paths are mainly intergranular with some transgranular that is consistent with micro-fractographic analysis. Classic high-pH stress corrosion cracking (SCC) mechanism cannot explain the presence of transgranular cracking, and other evidence observed such as the lack of corrosion products at the crack tip, lack of corrosion damage on the grain boundary and the lack of SCC colony on the OD surface of the pipe. These findings led to the potential role of hydrogen in the cracking mechanism observed in the above ground insulated pipeline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaterial Properties and Failure MechanismsFrench-language works237,207