MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409503428 · doi:10.1080/02568543.2025.2483529

Profiles of Low School Readiness Among At-Risk Preschoolers and Their Correlates in Kindergarten and Grade 1

2025· article· en· W4409503428 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Corinne Mavungu-Blouin, Marie‐Josée Letarte, Angélique Laurent, Jean‐Pascal Lemelin, Gabrielle Garon‐Carrier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research in Childhood Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPreschool educationEarly childhood educationAt-risk studentsMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

School readiness is a key early-life factor enabling children’s well-being and school adjustment across their life course. School readiness is a multidimensional concept that includes socioemotional (e.g., social skills, behaviors) and cognitive (e.g., pre-academic, language) skills. In the past decade, school readiness has been increasingly studied with a person-centered approach. This approach identifies subgroups or profiles of children with similar patterns of strengths and weaknesses in multiple indicators of school readiness. In this study, a latent profile analysis was conducted to identify profiles of school readiness among 300 French-Canadian preschoolers who are at risk of low school readiness. We also determined how they differed on their social and academic adjustment in kindergarten and Grade 1. Four profiles of school readiness were identified: Language Strength (20%), Ready for School (20%), Generalized Difficulties (40%), and Low Cognitive (21%) skills. These profiles significantly differed in their social adjustment, cognitive learning skills, and academic achievement in mathematics and in language arts. The Low Cognitive profile generally presents more difficulties than other profiles on all outcomes. This study highlights the strengths and vulnerabilities of preschoolers that should be targeted in early interventions, depending on the child’s specific profile of school readiness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Research in Childhood EducationSame topicEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207