A Retrospective Analysis of PK and Response of Oral Ibuprofen in the Treatment of a Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Oral ibuprofen is the preferred pharmacotherapeutic option for treatment of a persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), but evidence for its optimal use in extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs) remains limited. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and exposure‐response relationship of oral ibuprofen in ELGANs of ≤72 h postnatal age (PNA) on standard (SD) versus those >72 h PNA on high‐dose (HD) regimen for closure of persistent PDA. This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous population PK study of ELGANs with a persistent PDA treated with a SD (10–5–5 mg/kg/day, PNA <72 h) versus a HD (20–10–10 mg/kg/day, PNA >72 h) oral ibuprofen, with the primary aim of comparing degree of exposure, defined as AUC 0‐24 (AUC from time 0 to 24 h). Twelve ELGANs received SD versus 11 receiving HD oral ibuprofen. The mean (SD) of exposure at 24 h (AUC 0‐24 h ) was 486 (128) and 509 (208) ( P = .41) and at 72 h (AUC 0‐72 h ) was 1529 (493) and 1510 (820) ( P = .94). Two (16%) ELGANs in the HD group developed severe gastrointestinal (GI) AEs and 1 (9%) in the SD had severe intraventricular hemorrhage. The use of SD and HD oral ibuprofen in ELGANs with PNA of <72 h and those >72 h, respectively, resulted in comparable exposure. The PNA‐dependent response to oral ibuprofen and exposure‐response relationship in ELGANs of higher PNA needs further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".