Prediction of Weld Geometry in Laser Overlap Welding of Low-Carbon Galvanized Steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate prediction of weld bead geometry is critical for optimizing laser overlap welding of low-carbon galvanized steel, as it directly affects joint quality and mechanical performance. Traditional finite element method (FEM)-based models provide reliable predictions but are computationally expensive and impractical for real-time applications. This study presents an artificial neural network (ANN)-based predictive model trained on a combination of experimental data and validated FEM simulations to estimate key weld characteristics, including depth of penetration (DOP), weld bead width at the surface (WS), and weld bead width at the interface (WI). The ANN model was evaluated using various improved statistical metrics. Results demonstrated a strong correlation between ANN predictions and experimental measurements, with R2 values exceeding 95% for WS and DOP and 92% for WI, and mean errors below 7%. A comparative analysis between ANN, FEM, and experimental data confirmed the model’s reliability across different welding conditions. Additionally, ANN significantly reduced computational time compared to FEM while maintaining high accuracy, making it a practical tool for real-time process optimization. These findings highlight the potential of ANN models as efficient alternatives to conventional simulation techniques in laser overlap welding applications. Future improvements may involve integrating real-time sensor data and deep learning techniques to further enhance predictive performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".