MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409512462 · doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2025)809

Annual diversity of honeybee pollen sources in two pumpkin growing landscapes, Machakos County, Kenya

2025· article· en· W4409512462 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marystella Wekhanya, Muo Kasina, Rebecca Karanja, Mary Guantai, Rahab N. Kinyanjui, Evanson R. Omuse, H. Michael G. Lattorff, Elfatih M. Abdel‐Rahman, Marian Adan, Samira A. Mohamed, Thomas Dubois

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pollination Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFP7 International CooperationAustralian Centre for International Agricultural ResearchDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale ZusammenarbeitBundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und EntwicklungGovernment of the Republic of KenyaStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsPollenBiologyDiversity (politics)BotanyAgroforestryGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-floral foraging sources for honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) have been threatened by landscape changes and unsustainable farming practices. In East Africa, the biodiversity of forage resources that could support honey bees, especially in agricultural lands, remains least explored. This study investigated pollen diversity for honey bees in Yatta and Masinga Sub-counties in Machakos County, Kenya. Honey bee hives were installed on eight pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne ex Lam) farms (one hive per farm) in two varying landscape vegetation classes (low and medium) based on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Pollen traps were installed at the hive entrance and pollen pellets were retrieved fortnightly for subsequent identification. Approximately 115 pollen types were identified. The pollen pellets were associated with 63 plant families and 109 plant families in low and medium NDVI classes, respectively. The predominant source of pollen for honey bees in low NDVI class included the plant families Poaceae (5,526 pellets), Asteraceae (3,176 pellets), Combretaceae (1,327 pellets), Acanthaceae (1,122 pellets), Amaranthaceae (960 pellets), Boraginaceae (951 pellets), Typhaceae (889 pellets), Guaduelleae (809 pellets) and Loranthaceae (588 pellets). In medium NDVI, most pollen was sourced from plant family Asteraceae (3,605 pellets), Malvaceae (1,572 pellets), Poaceae (1,538 pellets), Combretaceae (1,468 pellets), Salvadoraceae (1,354 pellets), Solanaceae (1,011 pellets), Asphodelaceae (885 pellets), Fabaceae (882 pellets), Euphorbiaceae (685 pellets) and Myrtaceae (546 pellets). The diversity of pollen types varied between the NDVI classes and across months. Although honey bees sourced diverse pollen required for the dietary balance of the colony, there was variability across landscape types and months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pollination EcologySame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207