Birth of a bubble: drop impact onto a thin liquid film for an immiscible three-fluid system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When a drop impacts a solid substrate or a thin liquid film, a thin gas disc is entrapped due to surface tension, the gas disc retracting into one or several bubbles. While the evolution of the gas disc for impact on solid substrate or film of the same fluid as the drop has been largely studied, little is known on how it varies when the liquid of the film is different from that of the drop. We study numerically the latter unexplored area, focusing on the contact between the drop and the film, leading to the formation of an air bubble. The volume of fluid method was adapted to three fluids in the framework of the Basilisk solver. The numerical simulations show that the deformation of the liquid film due to air cushioning plays a crucial role in bubble entrapment. A new model for the contact time and the entrapment geometry was deduced from the case of the impact on a solid substrate. This was done by considering the deformation of the thin immiscible liquid layer during impact depending mainly on its thickness and viscosity. The lubrication of the gas layer was found to be the major effect governing bubble entrapment. However, the film viscosity was also identified as having a critical role in bubble formation and evolution; the magnitude of its influence was also quantified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".