Child opinions related to a core outcome set for school-based healthy lifestyle behavior interventions: the COCOS study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Including children's perspectives developing health programs is a priority. This study gathered children's perspectives on outcomes in a Core Outcomes Set (COS), which they believe are important to measure in school-based healthy lifestyle behavioral interventions. Methods: Children aged 8-12 years from six countries across three continents participated in standardized interactive focus groups. An animation video was used to explain all relevant concepts (e.g., "intervention", "outcomes") and showed animated children engaging in a variety of lifestyle behaviors at school. Participating children then brainstormed and proposed outcomes they consider important to measure when evaluating a school-based "healthy lifestyle programme". Next, children individually rated the importance of the outcomes using a traffic light system (red, "not important"; orange, "important"; green, "very important"). Similar outcomes (across focus groups and countries) were merged, and an overall importance rating was given to each outcome (across countries and overall). An outcome was considered important for inclusion in a COS if ≥70% of children scored the outcome as "very important" and <15% scored it as "not important". Results: = 159) proposed 170 unique outcomes. Children proposed thirty-six outcomes in at least two countries, of which 20 outcomes received an overall rating of "very important" in all countries where the outcomes were reported. Of these 20, five outcomes were reported by children in at least four countries: being healthy, healthy diet, concentration, having fun, and feeling happy. Conclusion: Children reported a wide range of outcomes related to physical and mental health, as well as enjoyment and social skills, such as having fun and making friends. All outcomes reported by children in at least two countries and considered "very important" will be considered for inclusion in the consensus stage of developing a COS for school-based intervention studies aimed at childhood overweight and obesity prevention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".