MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409524273 · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03595

Effectively managed Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park by regulating Korean pine seed collection

2025· article· en· W4409524273 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Conservation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEcology and Conservation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsTigerChinaGeographyLeopardNational parkForestryEnvironmental protectionAgroforestryArchaeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Effectively conserved and managed” is an important component of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Human activities continue to affect protected areas (PAs) worldwide, and reconciling biodiversity conservation with resource utilization represents a significant challenge for PA research. The Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park (TLNP) is a typical region of conflict between conservation restrictions and local livelihood. We employed Korean pine ( Pinus koraiensis ) seed collection activity in the TLNP as an illustrative example, utilizing maximum entropy model and spatial analysis to simulate suitable amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) habitat and human-tiger conflict risk areas during seed collection, to investigate approaches for enhancing the construction effects of PAs through delineating function zones. Results indicated that Korean pine contracting was ongoing in approximately one-third of core protected zones, reflecting high-intensity forest resource utilization. Suitable habitat for amur tiger covered 57.9 % of the park’s total area, and 23.7 % was affected by seed collection areas, which implied seed collection may alter tiger habitat use and exacerbate regional human-tiger conflict risks. Furthermore, we divided the Korean pine resource management function zones into four subzones, with differentiated management measures implemented. In addition, we proposed strategies for balancing conservation and development, including constructing collaborative governance systems, exploring pathways for ecological value transformation, and reinforcing the construction of early warning and monitoring systems. This study aims to provide a scientific foundation for underforest resource management in the TLNP and to serve as a reference for zoning planning of PAs in other regions. • The Maxent model and spatial analysis identified overlaps between suitable habitat and resource use in the TLNP. • Korean pine seed collection impacts forest resources and amur tiger habitat, exacerbating human-tiger conflicts. • Balancing conservation and resource use through a “two control zones and four function zones” refined zoning system. • Effective management by collaborative governance, ecological value realization, and conflict prevention system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it