MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409526523 · doi:10.4081/aiua.2025.13635

BRCA mutations and prostate cancer: should urologist improve daily clinical practice?

2025· article· en· W4409526523 on OpenAlexaff
Simona Vatrano, Pietro Pepe, Ludovica Pepe, Cristina Alario, Alessia Chiarandà, Renato Scillieri, Cristina Mauceri, Filippo Fraggetta

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsNewborn Screening Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGermlineProstate cancerGermline mutationGenetic testingFamily historyOncologyGenetic counselingSomatic cellCancerInternal medicineMutationGeneticsGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate BRCA1-2 (breast cancer) detection in men with high risk PCa, including the oncological consequences for the patient and family members. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2023 to December 2024, 52 men (median age 73 years;) with confirmed PCa diagnosis underwent somatic and germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 assessment; 11/52 (21%) patients documented a family history of cancer. Patients were at different clinical stages: high-grade (71% had a Gleason score ≥ 8), locally advanced (54% of cases) and/or metastatic PCa (46% of cases) at initial diagnosis, hormone-sensitive and/or castration-resistant PCa (38.2% of cases) at clinical progression. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses of BRCA genes were evaluated on 52 samples (prostate biopsies or definitive samples) collected at Gravina Hospital (Caltagirone, Italy) from different Sicilian pathology departments. The therapeutic and clinical impact of genetic testing for BRCA somatic and germline mutations was evaluated for patients and their families. RESULTS: All FFPE cases were successfully genotyped, with a good library and sequencing CQ metrics for all genes of interest; 10/52 (19.2%) patients had somatic or germline BRCA mutations, specifically, 3/52 (5.7%) had somatic and 7/52 (13.5%) had germline mutations. In the seven cases with germline variants, 4/7 (57%) had a family history of PCa or other diseases, while the remaining 3/7 (43%) patients had no hereditary predisposition. All identified genetic variants were related to the BRCA2 gene; after genetic screening of the corresponding relatives, various members of the analysed families carried the mutation identified in the proband, so that cancer prevention and/or active surveillance was possible. CONCLUSIONS: NGS analysis for BRCA genetic testing using FFPE tissue in the clinical setting of patients with high-grade and/or metastatic PCa appears to be a valuable tool, not only for therapeutic purposes, but also to identify families with genetic predisposition who may be underdiagnosed according to canonical criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivio Italiano di Urologia e AndrologiaSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207