MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On the consistency and stability of vegetation biophysical variables retrievals from Landsat-8/9 and Sentinel-2

2025· article· en· W4409528576 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Najib Djamai, Richard Fernandes, Lixin Sun, Gang Hong, Luke A. Brown, Harry Morris, Jadunandan Dash

Bibliographic record

VenueISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersJoint Research CentreNatural Resources CanadaEuropean Commission
KeywordsRemote sensingVegetation (pathology)Environmental scienceConsistency (knowledge bases)Stability (learning theory)GeographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Systematic decametric resolution global mapping of vegetation biophysical variables, including fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR), fraction of vegetation cover (fCOVER), and leaf area index (LAI), is required to support various activities, including climate adaptation, crop management, biodiversity monitoring, and ecosystem assessments. The Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) version of the Simplified Level 2 Prototype Processor (SL2P-CCRS) enables global mapping of these variables using freely available medium resolution multispectral satellite data from Sentinel-2 (S2) and Landsat-8/9 (LS) data. In this study, fiducial reference measurements (RMs) from the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) supplemented with regional measurements from CCRS were used to evaluate the consistency between SL2P-CCRS estimates of fAPAR, fCOVER and LAI from LS and S2 data and to quantify their temporal stability. SL2P-CCRS estimates of fCOVER (Accuracy (A) ∼ 0.03, Uncertainty (U) ∼ 0.13) and fAPAR (A ∼ −0.03, U ∼ 0.13) from LS and S2 were unbiased, and generally similar between sensors, based on 6569 LS-RMs and 4932 S2-RMs matchups. However, LAI estimates, especially for woody wetlands, deciduous forest, and mixed forest, were underestimated, with better estimates obtained using S2 (A ∼ −0.33, U ∼ 0.98) than LS (A ∼ −0.43, U ∼ 1.13). For all variables, SL2P-CCRS LS estimates were highly correlated to S2 estimates overall (R2 0.80 to 0.82) but up to 35 % lower for LAI over broadleaf and mixed forests and between lower 10 % and 20 % otherwise. The inter-annual stability of SL2P-CCRS estimates from both LS and S2 fell within the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) requirements with the mean (standard deviation) values of −0.01 yr −1 (0.06 yr −1 ) for LS LAI, 0.02 yr −1 (0.09 yr −1 ) for S2 LAI, and 0 yr −1 (0.01 yr −1 ) for fCOVER and fAPAR from both LS and S2. The stability of both S2 and LS vegetation biophysical products indicate that are well suited for quantify the physical response of vegetation to climate variability, disturbances and regeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207