Photoperiod influences visceral adiposity and the adipose molecular clock independent of temperature in wild‐derived <i>Peromyscus leucopus</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Physiology is closely synchronized to daily and seasonal light/dark cycles. Humans artificially extend daylight and experience irregular light schedules, resulting in dysregulation of metabolism and body mass. In rodents, winter‐like conditions (cold and short photoperiod) can alter energy balance and adipose tissue mass. To determine if photoperiod alone, independent of temperature, is a strong enough signal to regulate adiposity, we compared the effects of long and short photoperiod at thermoneutrality on adiposity and WAT gene expression in photoperiod‐sensitive, F1 generation wild‐derived adult male white‐footed mice ( Peromyscus leucopus ). Mice were housed in long‐day (16:8 light:dark) or short‐day (8:16 light:dark) photoperiod conditions at thermoneutrality (27°C) for 4 weeks with the extended light being provided through artificial lighting. Photoperiod did not impact body weight or calorie consumption. However, mice housed in long photoperiod with extended artificial light selectively developed greater visceral WAT mass without changing subcutaneous WAT or interscapular BAT mass. This was accompanied by a decrease in Adrβ3 and Ucp1 mRNA expression in visceral WAT with no change in Pgc1a , Lpl , or Hsl . Expression of Per1 , Per2 , and Nr1d1 mRNA in visceral WAT differed between long and short photoperiods over time when aligned to circadian time but not onset of darkness, indicating alterations in clock gene expression with photoperiod. These findings suggest that extended photoperiod through artificial light can promote visceral fat accumulation alone, independent of temperature, supporting that artificial light may play a role in obesity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it