MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409530098 · doi:10.1101/2025.04.15.25325860

Assessment of pain types in recently diagnosed patients with inflammatory arthritis

2025· preprint· en· W4409530098 on OpenAlexaff
Zoe Rutter‐Locher, Sam Norton, Joseph L. Taylor, Bina Menon, Tom Esterine, Ruth Williams, Leonie S. Taams, Kirsty Bannister, Bruce Kirkham

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsArthritisMedicineInflammatory arthritisInternal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective Up to 40% of patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) experience persistent pain, traditionally thought to be associated with a shift from peripheral to centrally mediated pain during the disease course in some patients. We assessed sensory profiles of recently diagnosed individuals with IA, hypothesising that pain reported at this early stage of diagnosis is driven predominantly by peripheral joint inflammation. Methods Recently diagnosed IA patients with pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores of ≥3 were recruited. We collected data on: Arthritis activity (Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28), musculoskeletal ultrasound); quality of life (Musculoskeletal Health questionnaire (MSK-HQ), Euro Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D)); mental health status (Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety, Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS)), and pain characteristics (fibromyalgia criteria, painDETECT, Static and Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing, QST). Results 61 participants (57% female, 62% rheumatoid arthritis) were enrolled: mean age 49.8 ±15; time since diagnosis 1.2±2.3 months. 97% had peripheral joint inflammation, with a mean DAS-28 score of 3.8±1. However, 20% had a tender minus swollen joint count of ≥7, 21% met the fibromyalgia criteria and 25% had a painDETECT score of ≥19, which significantly correlated with DAS28, MSK-HQ and PHQ-ADS scores. QST revealed lowered pressure pain thresholds at non-articular sites in a subset of participants and facilitated temporal pain summation and deficient pain modulation in 18% and 61% of patients respectively. Conclusion This study provides evidence of centrally mediated pain at the time of diagnosis, challenging the notion that, even at the early stage of disease, pain is driven only by peripheral mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE AND INNOVATIONS This study is the first to record comprehensive sensory profiles incorporating clinical examination, ultrasound, questionnaire, and quantitative sensory testing data in the early stage of inflammatory arthritis diagnosis. Of those tested, 97% had peripheral joint inflammation confirmed by clinical assessment and ultrasound. In addition, clinical, patient-reported and QST outcome measures revealed the likely presence of centrally mediated pain in a subset of participants. These findings challenge the current belief that only peripheral mechanisms driven by joint inflammation underpin pain in the early stage of disease progression, highlighting a role for centrally mediated pain even in the early stage of disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→