Performance Evaluation of Different Varieties of Okra (<i>Abelmoschus esculentus</i> L.) in Pyuthan District, Nepal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yield analysis is an effective way to understand the overall performance of the different varieties of okra.For this, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of different varieties of okra in the Pyuthan district within the vegetable zone of PMAMP Pyuthan from 29 March to 15 July 2023.An experiment was conducted during the summer season under open field conditions to assess the varietal performance of different okra genotypes.The experimental plot was laid out in a single factorial randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications.The experiment comprised five treatments, i.e., Arka Anamika, Rukmani, Raja F1, Special-45, and Arzine hybrid).To evaluate the performance of different varieties, morphological parameter, and yield parameter data were collected at separate time intervals, and further analysis was done using GenStat software.The experiment illustrates that the average mean yield of the five varieties was 65.75 g per plant.Overall, it was further revealed that the Rukmani varieties give the highest average yield (79.50 g), followed by Arka Anamika (76.25 g).The lowest yield was recorded in Raja F1 and Special-45 (52 g).Similarly, other parameters were also analyzed simultaneously to check the yield attributing factor, which revealed that plant average maximum height was observed in Rukmani (29.44 cm) at all growth stages, followed by Arzine (27.59 cm), Arka Anamika (26.21 cm), and Raja F1 (20.74 cm).Moreover, the number of primary branches was highest in Arzine (3) followed by Rukmani (2), Special-45(2), and Arka Anamika (2).Furthermore, the number of pods per plant was most significant in the Rukmani variety (6) and Arka Anamika (6).The study showed that the Arka Anamika was found in pod diameter (5.83 cm) among the other four varieties where the maximum pod length was recorded in the Rukmani variety (14.08 cm) followed by Arka Anamika.The pod weight was highest in Rukmani (14.50 g) and Arzine (14.50 g).Data revealed from the experiment showed that the Rukmani variety gave more yield per plant,and showed higher pod weight, pod per plant which are slight differences from Arka Anamika.From the field research, it can be concluded that Rukmani and Arka Anamika is a good varieties in terms of yield performance and more economical to the farmers who have growing okra in Pyuthan, Nepal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".