MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409544920 · doi:10.3390/surgeries6020036

A New Preclinical Surgical Model for the Assessment of Dental Implant Tissue Integration

2025· article· en· W4409544920 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan Noh, Nahrain Warda, John E. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgeries · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsImplantDental implantDentistryMedicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: The structural integrity and strength of the transgingival soft tissue seal around dental implant surfaces remain critical challenges. Therefore, animal models should include all three implant/tissue interfaces: bone, connective tissue, and epithelium. Thus, we sought to explore the rabbit mandibular diastema as a site for candidate intra-oral implant placement. Methods: Ninety-six custom mini-implants (with one of four different surfaces: machined, acid-etched, and with or without a nanotube coating) made from titanium 6/4 alloy were placed in the mandibular diastemas of twenty-four 16-week-old New Zealand white rabbits, with the implant collar above the alveolar crest. After 7, 21, and 42 days, the bony and connective tissue/implant interfaces were examined by light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Of ninety-six implants, eight implants were found exposed to the oral cavity, with no evidence of soft tissue inflammation, suggesting that transmucosal implant placement would have been feasible. No significant differences were observed in collagen fiber orientation and fibrous tissue thickness by polarized light microscopy. However, SEM images showed that at all three time points, topographically complex nanotube surfaces had a profound effect on soft tissue peri-implant deposition, although functionally oriented collagen fibers were not identified attached to the implant surface. These surfaces also showed reparative peri-implant bone in the collar region. An intramembranous form of de novo bone formation was observed, together with tartrate-resistant acid-phosphatase-positive osteoclasts and multinucleate giant cells in the peri-implant endosseous compartment. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the rabbit mandibular diastema provides an intra-oral method of implant placement without the necessity of an extra-oral approach, tooth extractions, or bone augmentation procedures. Furthermore, given that three implant tissue interfaces can potentially be studied (bone, connective tissue, and epithelium) this model provides advantages over more traditional implant placement sites in the appendicular skeleton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurgeriesSame topicDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207