MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409548094 · doi:10.1017/9789400603561.003

From Democratic Politics to Democratic Poetics

2019· other· en· W4409548094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical theory and Gramsci
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsDemocracyPoliticsPolitical sciencePolitical economySociologyArtLiteratureLawPoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whitman's Poetic Innovations Equality Whitman in his political life was a democrat. In his poetry he believed in democracy and equality of all members of society. His definition of democracy can be summarised as the equality of all people. America failed to live up to its ideal of equality; Whitman believed in the central role of poets in a democratic society. Of all mankind the great poet is the equable man. Not in him but off from him things are grotesque or eccentric or fail of their sanity … He bestows on every object or quality its fit proportions neither more nor less. He is the arbiter of the diverse and he is the key. He is the equalizer of his age and land. Whitman decided to play his part in his poetry. In Leaves he portrayed a democratic utopia where every citizen was treated equally. He called himself the poet of Equality, between blacks and whites, between men and women. In “By Blue Ontario's Shore,” he wrote “Here are the flowing trains, here the crowds, equality, diversity, the soul loves.” Equality is the main feature of a democracy and the central theme for the poet of America. Whitman's themes centre on equality; to deal with such themes he created “a new language of equality” which would later be elaborated on. Body Whitman broke the nineteenth-century taboos against writing about the body. While the body was included in the unmentionable topics of respected communities with puritan and Victorian morality, he spoke about it with honesty and openness. It was integral to his idea of equality. He was the poet of equality; that was why he turned into “the prophet of the body.” All humans live in bodies and the body is equal and common to everybody; it represents equality. His poetry depicts “body as a locus of democratic energies.” He believed that sexual expression in popular culture was cheapened; he treated the body in an artistic manner. He put his poetry in the category of physiology. That reduced the criticism of his depiction of the body. Ignoring some parts of the body would reduce the criticism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.035
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolitical theory and GramsciFrench-language works237,207