Valorization of grape pomace by microbial fermentation: Composition, biological activities and potential applications for the food industry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grape pomace is a rich source of nutrients and bioactive substances, including dietary fiber, (poly)phenols, and other phytochemicals. This review aims to highlight the current knowledge on microbial fermentation of grape pomace, composition and biological activities of fermented grape pomace and discuss the potential of using fermented grape pomace for the development of functional food ingredients, supplemented foods, and nutraceuticals. Fermentation of grape pomace using various microorganisms, including filamentous fungi, edible mushrooms, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria, has been shown to enhance the (poly)phenolic profile of grape pomace. Furthermore, bioactive microbial metabolites (postbiotics) such as gallic acid, pyrogallol, scopoletin and catechol, which were not detected in the initial pomace-based substrates or extracts, were produced through biotransformation. Biotransformed grape pomace has exhibited beneficial and enhanced biological properties such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-steatotic activities. Microbial-based valorization of grape pomace offers a sustainable approach to producing novel food ingredients and nutraceuticals with valuable health benefits. • Microbial fermentation of grape pomace and (poly)phenols changes are discussed. • Filamentous fungi, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria effectively biotransform grape pomace. • Fermented grape pomace shows enhanced bioactivity and health-promoting properties. • Valorization reduces winery waste, enhances (poly)phenols, and yields postbiotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it