Approaches to the development of pupils’ social skills: foreign experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the analysis of foreign experience in the development of pupils’ social skills within the context of modern educational systems in countries such as the USA, Canada, Germany, and Austria. The article presents official sources that regulate the educational process, as well as research and programs aimed at the development of pupils’ social skills in these countries. It thoroughly explores the essence of programs and projects that are effectively implemented for the formation and development of pupils’ social skills, as well as approaches to creating an educational environment. The article analyzes the main principles, approaches, and characteristics of the implementation of programs at the state level, comparing educational approaches to the development of pupils’ social skills, and identifies common and distinctive features of these approaches. Attention is focused on key approaches implemented in each country, such as social-emotional learning, inclusion, and the development of emotional competence. A separate focus of the article is the organization of professional development for teachers in relation to the formation of pupils’ social skills and the provision of methodological support for educational programs and projects. Additionally, based on the analysis of the considered educational systems, the author identifies key elements of the educational process that contribute to the effective development of pupils’ social skills: the integration of social skills into academic subjects, the creation of a supportive learning environment, and the monitoring of the educational environment. In the concluding section, the article substantiates the prospects of adapting foreign experience into the Ukrainian educational system, particularly by combining elements of the Canadian model of social-emotional learning with the German system of integrating social skills into academic subjects. The conclusion is made that a comprehensive approach, involving all participants in the educational process, is key to the successful development of social competence in pupils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".