Stimulation‐Induced Dyskinesia in <scp>STN DBS</scp> Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stimulation-induced dyskinesia (SID) is a poorly studied and usually transient manifestation of subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD), which can be troubling for patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to describe the features and management of SID in PD patients undergoing STN DBS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study among 86 STN DBS patients. Clinical features and volume of tissue activated (VTA) were correlated to SID occurrence. RESULTS: SID was identified in 28 (32.6%) patients and persisted for 6 months in six patients (7.0%). VTA overlap with the right motor STN was associated (P < 0.02) with SID. Weaning dopaminergic drugs and reducing the DBS amplitude were the most used strategies to control SID. CONCLUSIONS: SID is a relatively common complication of STN DBS and can be persistent. It often requires specific postoperative management strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".