MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409567892 · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf170

X-Linked Hypophosphatemia Management in Adults: An International Working Group Clinical Practice Guideline

2025· article· en· W4409567892 on OpenAlexafffund
Aliya Khan, Dalal S. Ali, Natasha M. Appelman‐Dijkstra, Thomas O. Carpenter, Catherine Chaussain, Erik A. Imel, Suzanne M. Jan de Beur, Pablo Florenzano, Hajar Abu Alrob, Rana Aldabagh, R. Todd Alexander, Farah Alsarraf, Signe Sparre Beck‐Nielsen, Martin Biosse Duplan, Martine Cohen‐Solal, Rachel Crowley, Karel Dandurand, Guido Filler, Lisa Friedlander, Seiji Fukumoto, Claudia Gagnon, Paul Goodyer, Corinna Grasemann, Chelsey Grimbly, Salma Hussein, M K Javaid, Sarah Khan, Aneal Khan, Anna Lehman, Willem F. Lems, E. Michael Lewiecki, Ciara McDonnell, Reza Mirza, Emmett Morgante, Archibald Morrison, Anthony A. Portale, Yumie Rhee, Eric T. Rush, Heide Siggelkow, Sotirios Tetradis, Laura L. Tosi, Leanne M. Ward, Gordon Guyatt, Maria Luisa Brandi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of British ColumbiaWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaMcGill University Health CentreLondon Health Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversité de SherbrookeTrillium Health CentreUniversité LavalUniversity of AlbertaImpactChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioChildren's Hospital of Western Ontario
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesMcMaster University
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineHypophosphatemiaEvidence-based practiceIntensive care medicineMultidisciplinary approachPHEXPhysical therapyFamily medicineInternal medicinePathologyVitamin D and neurologyAlternative medicineRickets

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: An international working group (IWG) consisting of experts in X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) developed global guidelines providing a comprehensive, evidence-based approach to XLH diagnosis, management, and monitoring. METHODS: The IWG, consisting of 43 members as well as methodologists and a patient partner, conducted 2 systematic reviews (SRs) and narrative reviews to address key areas. The SRs addressed the impact of burosumab compared to conventional therapy (phosphate and active vitamin D) or no therapy on patient-important outcomes in adults. They also evaluated conventional therapy compared to no therapy. GRADE methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Non-GRADED recommendations were made in the presence of insufficient evidence to conduct SRs. These guidelines have been reviewed and endorsed by several medical and patient societies and organizations. RESULTS: The diagnosis of XLH is based on integrating clinical evaluation, laboratory findings confirming renal phosphate wasting (following exclusion of conditions mimicking XLH), and skeletal imaging. Fibroblast growth factor 23 measurement and DNA analysis are of value in the diagnosis, if available. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the PHEX gene are confirmatory but not necessary for the diagnosis. Management requires a multidisciplinary team knowledgeable and experienced in XLH. Effective medical therapy with burosumab can improve fracture and pseudofracture healing. MAIN CONCLUSION: In adults with XLH and fractures or pseudofractures, burosumab is recommended over no therapy (strong recommendation, GRADEd). Additionally, burosumab is suggested as the preferred treatment compared to conventional therapy (conditional recommendation, GRADEd) in the absence of fractures or pseudofractures. If burosumab is not available, symptomatic adults should be treated with conventional therapy (Non-GRADEd recommendation).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207