MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409571950 · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.180503

Laser-direct energy deposition of the high γ′ LW 4280 Ni-based superalloy

2025· article· en· W4409571950 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashutosh Jena, Alexandre Gontcharov, Paul Lowden, Mathieu Brochu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Alloys and Compounds · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsSuperalloyMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)LaserMetallurgyPulsed laser depositionMicrostructureNanotechnologyGeologyThin filmPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the structure-properties relationships of LW 4280 processed using laser direct energy deposition. The alloy exhibited a typical dendritic microstructure in the as-deposited condition, with a significant microsegregation of alloying elements. Fine γ′ precipitates were present in the dendrite cores, while the interdendritic regions showed relatively coarser γ′ precipitates and Ta, Hf, and W-based carbides. The γ′ precipitates were enriched in Al, and Ta, whereas the γ matrix was rich in Cr, Co, W, Re and Mo. The application of a two-step sub-solvus heat treatment to the as-deposited specimens resulted in the growth of Ta, Hf, and W-based carbides, the formation of Cr-based carbides, and a bimodal distribution of roughly 49 % γ′ precipitates. Despite heat treatments, chemical variations persisted between dendrite cores and interdendritic regions. The difference in lattice parameters between the γ phase and γ′ precipitates was used to determine the lattice mismatch in both the as-deposited and heat-treated specimens. The heat treatment increased the hardness from 434 ± 15 HV 0.1 to 495 ± 17 HV 0.1 . Heat-treated specimens also exhibited excellent thermophysical and mechanical properties at both room temperature and elevated temperatures. Stress rupture tests at elevated temperatures revealed an outstanding rupture life, including 1084 h at 788 °C/448 MPa, 119 h at 871 °C/276 MPa, 458 h at 927 °C/179 MPa, and 93 h at 982 °C/138 MPa. Axial fatigue tests were conducted at 982 °C under stress amplitudes of 168, 134, and 121 MPa, resulting in fatigue lives of 3.5E+ 06, 1.0E+ 07, and 1.13E+ 07 cycles, respectively. • Crack-free, dense LW 4280 specimens were fabricated using laser–direct energy deposition. • A slower cooling rate resulted in the formation of γ′ precipitates during deposition. • Heat treatment resulted in the growth of γ′ precipitates and the carbides. • Heat-treated LW 4280 showed excellent mechanical properties at low and high temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Alloys and CompoundsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207