Design of arable land protection framework in the context of ecological civilisation based on hybrid optimisation algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
arable land protection. In order to realize the protection of arable land in the context of ecological civilization, this paper designs a governance framework for arable land protection based on supply, empowerment, and control on the basis of the trinity of arable land protection policy of quantity, quality, and ecology, and constructs a multi-objective land use structure optimization model, and obtains a scenario prognosis for the optimal allocation of the land use structure by using a hybrid genetic algorithm. Taking County A as the specific research object, it can be seen by predicting the land use structure under the natural development scenario of County A that, relative to the status quo in 2023, the predicted share of arable land in 2050 has the largest decrease of 0.49%, and the shares of garden land, forest land, grassland and water area have all decreased, which is mainly converted into construction land (increased by 0.78%). From the Pareto frontier solution of land ecological benefit objective and economic benefit objective, three typical schemes of land use structure optimization were obtained, among which, the optimization scheme of balanced development of economy and ecology balanced economic and ecological development balanced economic development and ecological protection, and was selected as the optimization scheme of this paper. The increase of arable land area in this scheme is 0.38%, much higher than the -2.46% in the unoptimized case, which is in line with the requirement of arable land retention and can be used as a reference for further optimization of arable land protection framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it