Study on the Path of Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Industry and the Strategy to Eliminate “Digital Divide” under the Regional Integration of Yangtze River Delta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the research of digital economy and digital transformation of manufacturing industry, the article constructs the evaluation index system of digital economy development level and digital transformation of manufacturing industry in Yangtze River Delta respectively. The entropy weight TOPSIS method is used to measure and analyze the level of digital economy development and the level of digital transformation of manufacturing industry in the Yangtze River Delta respectively. The coupling coordination degree of digital economy and manufacturing digital transformation in the Yangtze River Delta in general and in each province and city is calculated and analyzed. On the basis of the relevant conclusions, recommendations for the digital transformation of the manufacturing industry and the elimination of the “digital divide” in the Yangtze River Delta are proposed. The overall trend of digital economy in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) is on the rise, but there is a significant “digital divide”. The increase in the level of digital economy development in the Yangtze River Delta over the past 10 years is 10.76%. The average value of digital economy development water in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Anhui is 0.358, 0.549, 0.491, 0.185 respectively, and the development of digital economy in Anhui is insufficient. Shanghai’s manufacturing digitalization water average is 0.750, the highest level in the Yangtze River Delta. Zhejiang and Anhui are slightly behind in manufacturing digital transformation. The coupling coordination degree of digital economy and manufacturing digital transformation in the Yangtze River Delta grew from 0.592 to 0.879, and the type of coupling coordination development shifted from barely coordinated to well coordinated. Shanghai and Jiangsu have reached the good coordination level. Zhejiang is at the intermediate coordination level. And Anhui is at the barely coordinated stage, which is the lowest level in the Yangtze River Delta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".