MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409574349 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553740

Surface brightness–colour relations of Cepheids calibrated by optical interferometry

2025· article· en· W4409574349 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Bailleul, N. Nardetto, V. Hocdé, P. Kervella, W. Gieren, J. Storm, G. Pietrzyński, A. Gallenne, A. Mérand, Garance Bras, A. Recio Blanco, P. de Laverny, P. A. Palicio, Anton V. Afanasiev, Wilma Kiviaho

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto MilleniumCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEuropean Space AgencyAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean CommissionWorkplace Safety and Insurance Board
KeywordsCepheid variablePhysicsInterferometryBrightnessAstrophysicsSurface brightnessAstronomySurface (topology)OpticsApparent magnitudeStarsGalaxyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Surface brightness–colour relations (SBCRs) are widely used to determine the angular diameters of stars. They are in particular used in the Baade-Wesselink (BW) method of distance determination of Cepheids. However, the impact of the SBCR on the BW distance of Cepheids is about 8%, depending on the choice of SBCR considered in the literature. Aims. We aim to calibrate a precise SBCR dedicated to Cepheids using the best quality interferometric measurements available as well as different photometric bands, including the Gaia bands. Methods. We selected interferometric and photometric data in the literature for seven Cepheids covering different pulsation periods. From the phased photometry in the different bands (VJHKGGBP GRP) corrected from extinction and the interferometric limb-darkened angular diameters, we calculated the SBCR associated with each combination of colours. Results. We first find that the seven Cepheids have consistent SBCRs as long as the two magnitudes considered are not too close in wavelengths. For the SBCR (FV, V − K): FV = −0.1336±0.0009(V − K)0 + 3.9572±0.0015, we obtain a root mean square (RMS) of 0.0040 mag, which is three times lower than the latest estimate from 2004. Also, for the first time, we present an SBCR dedicated to Cepheids based on Gaia bands only: FGBP = −0.3001±0.0030(GBP − GRP)0 + 3.9977±0.0029, with an excellent RMS of 0.0061 mag. However, using theoretical models, we show that this SBCR is highly sensitive to metallicity. From this empirical multi-wavelength approach, we also show that the impact of the CircumStellar Environment (CSE) of Cepheids emission is not negligible and should be taken into account in the future. Conclusions. With this study, we improve the calibration and our understanding of the SBCR of Cepheids. The overall goal of this project is to provide a purely empirical SBCR version of the BW method that takes into account the metallicity and the CSE emission of Cepheids and that could be applied to individual Cepheids in the local group in the context of JWST and ELT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207