A neural network-based study on improving the interactive effect of teaching Marxist theory in Civics courses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The further deepening of education informatization has led to a significant shift in teaching methods as well as learning tools, and it is of research significance to explore how to use online learning platforms more effectively in non-traditional teaching environments. In this study, after pre-processing the online teaching data of Marxist theory in the Civics course, the Squeeze method is used to extract the relevant features of teaching interaction behavior in the data. Convolutional neural network is used to realize the prediction of teaching interaction behavior based on the input features, so as to realize the real-time intervention and effect enhancement strategy of teaching interaction. It is verified that the ICAM-ResNet neural network prediction model proposed in this paper has a good effect in making online teaching interactive behavior prediction, and the prediction accuracy can reach 0.816. After implementing the intervention strategy according to the prediction results, the average online learning time of students increased from 30.61 min (1 class period) to 44.54 min (16 class periods), and most of the students would actively answer the questions in the classroom, and the rate of answering correctly increased, so that the effect of teacher-student interactions was substantially improved. On the one hand, this study provides a new way of thinking for the teaching research of Marxist theory course, on the other hand, the results of the study are conducive to optimizing the teaching practice of the course and promoting the teaching interaction, so as to promote the development of the teaching of the course.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".