MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409577498 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112472

Consecutive low-frequency shifts in A/T content denote nucleosome positions across microeukaryotes

2025· article· en· W4409577498 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen J. Mondo, Guifen He, Aditi Sharma, Doina Ciobanu, Robert Riley, William Andreopoulos, Anna Lipzen, Alan Kuo, Kurt LaButti, Jasmyn Pangilinan, Asaf Salamov, Hugh Salamon, John M. Gladden, Jon Magnuson, M. Catherine Aime, Ronan C. O’Malley, Igor V. Grigoriev

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersBiological and Environmental ResearchOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsContent (measure theory)NucleosomeChemistryNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsMathematicsBiochemistryHistone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nucleosomes are the basic repeating unit, each spanning ≈150bp, that structures DNA in the nucleus and their positions have major consequences on gene activity. Here, through analyzing DNA signatures across 1117 microeukaryote genomes, we discovered ≈150bp shifts in A/T content associated with nucleosome organization. Often consecutively arrayed across the genome, A/T peaks were enriched surrounding transcriptional start sites in specific clades. Most nucleosomes (both in vitro and in vivo ) across eukaryotes aligned with A/T peaks, even in the presence of DNA modifications. Using artificial intelligence-based approaches, we describe DNA features associated with nucleosomes and construct a deep learning (DL) model for improved nucleosome occupancy prediction. Using this model, we found that ≈70% of "random" transfer DNA inserts from an in vivo fungal RB-TDNAseq library avoided DL predicted nucleosome-bound regions. This study reveals a eukaryote-wide strategy for generating cassettes of nucleosome-favorable DNAs that has a profound impact on nucleosome organization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207