Optimization of Digital Media Content Generation and Communication Effect Combined with Deep Learning Technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The combination of deep learning and digital media technology provides great scope for content creation. The article uses Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) in deep learning for content generation. Based on the three major forms of digital media content (image, audio, and video), image, audio, and video are generated by U-Net_GAN model, MAS-GAN model, and SSFLVGAN model, respectively, to construct a digital media content generation model based on generative adversarial networks. Subsequently, the model is validated for performance and the generated images, audio and video are evaluated for effectiveness. By studying the shortcomings of digital media content generation, we propose suggestions to improve its dissemination effect. The U-Net_GAN model outperforms other image generation models in all the indexes of generating images. The performance of speech generation and enhancement of MAS-GAN is much better than other audio generation and enhancement models. The average score of HDR video generated by SSFLVGAN is 4.20, and the average DMOS score is 5.97. The average DMOS score of SSFLVGAN is 5.97. DMOS score is 5.97, which are both 0.16 points higher than the traditional scheme. SSFLVGAN and the traditional scheme are comparable in terms of the picture impact of the generated video. The picture detail effect of the SSFLVGAN generated video is much better than the traditional scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".