MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409580887 · doi:10.54014/2ej6-eg29

Opportunism and diversity in the lifestyle of a group II intron

2009· dissertation· en· W4409580887 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Arthur Beauregard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicGame Theory and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsOpportunismDiversity (politics)IntronGroup (periodic table)GeographyEconomicsSociologyBiologyAnthropologyPhysicsMarket economyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Group II introns are mobile retroelements. They invade the cognate intron-minus gene in an efficient process known as retrohoming. They can also retrotranspose to ectopic sites at low frequency. Retrohoming occurs by the intron RNA reverse-splicing into double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) through an endonuclease-dependent pathway. However, in retrotransposition in Lactoccocus lactis, the intron inserts predominantly into single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), in an endonuclease-independent manner. Unlike in L. lactis, in Escherichia coli the Ll.LtrB intron retrotransposes frequently into dsDNA, and the process is dependent on the endonuclease activity of the intron-encoded protein. Further, the endonuclease-dependent integrations preferentially occurred around the origin and terminus of chromosomal DNA replication. These macrodomains migrate toward the poles of the cell, where the intron-encoded protein, LtrA, localizes. Integrations in E. coli can also occur through an endonuclease-independent pathway, and, as in L. lactis, such events have a more random integration pattern. Our findings show that Ll.LtrB can retrotranspose through at least two distinct mechanisms and that the host environment influences the choice of integration pathway. We investigated whether alteration of nucleoid condensation, chromosome partitioning and replication affect retrotransposition frequencies, as well as bipolar localization of the Ll.LtrB intron and LtrA in E. coli. Although there were some dramatic fluctuations in retrotransposition levels, bipolar localization of integration events was maintained. LtrA was consistently found in nucleoid-free regions, with its localization to the cellular poles being largely preserved in these hosts. Together, these results suggest that bipolar localization of group II intron retrotransposition results from the residence of the intron-encoded protein at the poles of the cell. The group II Ll.LtrB intron resides on the pRS01 conjugative plasmid of L. lactis, in the ltrB gene, which encodes a conjugative relaxase. Intron splicing is necessary to produce a functional relaxase, LtrB, which initiates conjugation by nicking the DNA at the origin of transfer (oriT). We show that pRS01 and relaxase stimulates retrotransposition. LtrF, a DNA-binding protein that, like LtrB, is an essential component of the relaxosome, also stimulated retrotransposition. These results indicate that the relaxosome enhances retrotransposition, providing a rationale for the residence of group II introns on a conjugative mobile element. Collectively, my studies show that the lifestyle of the group II intron is influenced by the host and by circumstances prevailing in the bacterial cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGame Theory and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207