MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409580897 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-095

Optimization research on the spatial layout of dance drama performance based on fractal geometry

2025· article· en· W4409580897 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qian Lian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceFractalDramaGeometryComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)MathematicsArtMathematical analysisVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dance drama performance is an important part of human civilization, which runs through the long history of human development. With the continuous improvement of people’s spiritual and cultural needs, the pursuit of dance theater performance has become more and more intense. In this paper, we start from the basic knowledge of fractal geometry, such as the theory, concept, dimension, and generation mechanism of fractal, to launch the research on the optimization of the spatial layout of dance drama performance. The main work of this paper involves the following aspects: (1) It focuses on the definition and characteristics of fractal geometry, and deeply studies the application of fractal geometry in the optimization of the spatial layout of dance drama performances. (2) The demand for dance drama performance space optimization is analyzed in terms of developmental changes and audience demand. It can be seen that the footprint of the dance performance continues to increase, but the use of space is gradually decreasing, and the audience has higher expectations for the stage performance, the demand for the development of the dance performance and the audience demand to promote the process of optimization of the space layout of the dance performance. (3) This paper adopts the left-right symmetrical presentation, fully considers the visual effect of the viewers, and constructs the optimized layout of dance drama performance space based on fractal geometry. (4) The optimized layout method of this paper is applied to the actual evaluation of the effect, in which the two groups A and B, located in the main audience area, have higher overall ratings, respectively 5.78 and 6.04, and the main audience area has a better perspective experience, so the overall experience is relatively better. The score of the viewer experience after optimization of the dance drama performance space layout in this paper is 5.715 points, which indicates that the viewers are satisfied with the effect of optimization of the layout in this paper, and the better results of the optimization of the dance drama performance space layout in this paper provide some reference for the dance drama performance space layout.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207