Vertex Correspondence and Self-Intersection Reduction in Cortical Surface Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mesh-based cortical surface reconstruction is essential for neuroimaging, enabling precise measurements of brain morphology such as cortical thickness. Establishing vertex correspondence between individual cortical meshes and group templates allows vertex-level comparisons, but traditional methods require time-consuming post-processing steps to achieve vertex correspondence. While deep learning has improved accuracy in cortical surface reconstruction, optimizing vertex correspondence has not been the focus of prior work. We introduce Vox2Cortex with Correspondence (V2CC), an extension of Vox2Cortex, which replaces the commonly used Chamfer loss with L1 loss on registered surfaces. This approach improves inter- and intra-subject correspondence, which makes it suitable for direct group comparisons and atlas-based parcellation. Additionally, we analyze mesh self-intersections, categorizing them into minor (neighboring faces) and major (non-neighboring faces) types.To address major self-intersections, which are not effectively handled by standard regularization losses, we propose a novel Self-Proximity loss, designed to adjust non-neighboring vertices within a defined proximity threshold. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that recent deep learning methods inadequately address vertex correspondence, often causing inaccuracies in parcellation. In contrast, our method achieves accurate correspondence and reduces self-intersections to below 1% for both pial and white matter surfaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".