MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409581161 · doi:10.1093/europace/euaf088

Countywide burden, pathology, and genetics of lethal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: from the POST SCD study

2025· article· en· W4409581161 on OpenAlexaff
Leila Haghighat, Andrew J. Connolly, Francesca N. Delling, Theodore P. Abraham, Ellen Moffatt, Zian H. Tseng

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHypertrophic cardiomyopathyMedicineSudden cardiac deathIncidence (geometry)Sudden deathAutopsyCause of deathGenetic testingCohortCardiomyopathyOccultInternal medicineCardiologyPediatricsPathologyHeart failureDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is 1%/year in cohorts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but this estimate presumes arrhythmic cause and misses occult cases dying before diagnosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: POST SCD (POstmortem Systematic InvesTigation of Sudden Cardiac Death) is a prospective cohort study using autopsy, clinical records, and toxicology to adjudicate arrhythmic or non-arrhythmic causes among presumed SCDs (pSCDs) meeting WHO criteria aged 0-90 years in San Francisco County. We included all incident cases 2/1/2011-3/1/2014 (n = 525) and approximately every third day 3/1/2014-9/1/2022 (n = 497) based on medical examiner call schedule. We identified HCM victims via three approaches: (i) pathology; (ii) echocardiogram [transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)]; (iii) genetic criteria. Incidence calculations used county data and estimated HCM prevalence of 1:500 from studies of persons aged 23-35 years old. Of 1022 pSCDs [558 (54.6%) arrhythmic deaths] during the study period, 13 had HCM: 10 met pathology criteria; 2 via review of 203 TTEs (missed on initial report); 1 via genetic testing. Of these, 11 were arrhythmic deaths, yielding 1.3% burden of sudden death (pSCD) and 2% of arrhythmic death. Only 2 of 13 (15%) pSCDs with HCM had pre-mortem diagnosis. Incidence for persons with HCM 18-35 years old was 0.2% pSCDs/year and 0.1% SADs/year. pSCDs with HCM had a higher proportion of arrhythmic cause [11/13 (85%) vs. 547/1009 (54%), P = 0.03] than those without. pSCD burden due to HCM decreased with age (P = 0.003), highest among victims <35 years old, for whom HCM accounted for 7.1% of pSCD and 9.4% of arrhythmic death. Genetic testing of 317 consented pSCDs yielded pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 40% (2/5) and identified one additional case without clinical phenotype. CONCLUSION: In this 11-year countywide post-mortem study, HCM meeting pathologic, clinical, or genetic criteria was associated with autopsy-confirmed arrhythmic cause of sudden death, accounting for 2% of SADs up to age 90, highest in cases <35 years old. Since 85% of cases were undiagnosed before pSCD, the true burden of HCM-related sudden death may be substantially underestimated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207